Yep, i misunderstood that reply

Try firefox browser

Moderator: Mods
Hi Guys,Recio wrote:Hi,
Royal Blue is a colour with a wavelength of 450 nm. It is a deep dark azure colour. It is close to the uv wavelength in the ligth spectrum and it si able to induce fluorescence like the uv.
Madas, do not forget your uv ligth ... and keep us enligthed![]()
Regards
Recio
PS: it would be great to look at those birds with a royal blue ligth.
One of my favourite birds! Blue SL dom. edged misty with/without cinnamon (not sure). That bird in cobalt violet would be one for any collection. Add to that a cobalt violet opaline cleartail, and I think you'd have the two of the most beautiful combinations possible.madas wrote:What am I the second???
Another of my favourites. You really spoiled us! I haven't seen such good quality pics of Malabars yet. Any chance of emerald collared parakeets?madas wrote:Psittacula columboides:
Just realised how dumb that was. 2 Dark factors makes a Mauve so I am mystified again.The hen looks to have a Dark factor and one other unknown factor. IMO the chick is a combination of all 3.
Unfortunately not.Tartan ringnecks wrote: Hi madas
The pic of the blue Dom/edged is a great pic
Did you see any other edged birds on your trip.
first question: yes. second: no, i haven't payed attenion to it. third: haven't but i will try to get this info.Ring0Neck wrote:Madas,
Thanks a mil for the pics.
The parent male's ring color was it a soft pink?
Did you see if the inside tail was white ?
Did you or can you ask if that briliant purple offspring got darker much darker then before first molt?
thx. Phenotype was like your violet(df) dark(sf) blue but without the greyish washover. Yeah as i wrote the father was steps darker then the mother. But both haven't showed any sign of violet. Very strange. I was promised one bird of each phenotype. Means one of the mother, one of the father and one of the combined offspring. But this has to wait some years. For now we have made an agreement that the owner should try (and hopefully will do) to breed dubble-factor birds of each parents phenotype. Pretty sure one of the pairing is giving us mauves and the other some kind of violet bird.Johan S wrote:Madas, you are a legend. Fantastic pics, thank you!![]()
As fot the violet offspring, what a beautiful bird. The genetic make up will probably be a mystery for some time to come. Perhaps you have booked one of the future offspring? To me, it seems like the father is a bit darker than the mother. I would classify the offspring bird in the region of DF violet (reminds me of NT) SF dark. Perhaps DF violet SF deep? But I'm guessing.
Yeah, but they were not exhibited as SL edged birds.Johan S wrote: One of my favourite birds! Blue SL dom. edged misty with/without cinnamon (not sure). That bird in cobalt violet would be one for any collection. Add to that a cobalt violet opaline cleartail, and I think you'd have the two of the most beautiful combinations possible.
I do my best. ;) Yeah very nice birds. regarding the emerald collared parakeets: they were not exhibited.Johan S wrote: Another of my favourites. You really spoiled us! I haven't seen such good quality pics of Malabars yet. Any chance of emerald collared parakeets?
What were they called?madas wrote:Yeah, but they were not exhibited as SL edged birds.Johan S wrote: One of my favourite birds! Blue SL dom. edged misty with/without cinnamon (not sure). That bird in cobalt violet would be one for any collection. Add to that a cobalt violet opaline cleartail, and I think you'd have the two of the most beautiful combinations possible.![]()
"Fusi". A new sex-linked incomplete dominant Mutation.Johan S wrote: What were they called?
Do you speak of the last pic with two cleartail birds??? No Mauve on it. ;)Johan S wrote: As for the last of the new pics. What a strange cock bird. Looks mauve at the neck, but very light blue rump for a mauve.
Yeah and that's why the knowledge of the cross-over rate between cinnamon and SL edged is very important to know. The breeder said he hasn't breed any normal cinnamon or SL edged bird out of "fusi" males. So if it is a combination then cinnamon and edged must be very close linked. So that they can't be splited easily. But if i remember correct Tienie had a feeling that the crossover rate is high resp. normal (50:50). If it is true then "fusi" could be a single mutation. Time will tell.Johan S wrote:Well, if "fusi" is a single mutation, and not a combination of three, I would very much like to have one. Then my dream bird of cobalt violet "fusi" would be much simpler to breed. Only one or two years.
I completely missed this part, but agree 100% on the mauves and violets.madas wrote:For now we have made an agreement that the owner should try (and hopefully will do) to breed dubble-factor birds of each parents phenotype. Pretty sure one of the pairing is giving us mauves and the other some kind of violet bird.
I know what you mean about constant change- one of my hen's does that- very confusing, the chicks in the bucket- are they unrelated? what is the one down on the bottom?- which parents, and what mutations do you know of so far for the chicks?Ring0Neck wrote: can you see how the color changes according to diff lighting conditions?
it is almost an illusion almost in constant change
http://parakeet.me/irn/f/DSC_0170.jpg
btw this is the darkest chick - see pic below: the 1 on the left 9o'clock in the bucket 12 is an sf violet for reference
http://parakeet.me/irn/f/PICT1005.JPG
Hi great Madas,madas wrote:First impression. Unfortunately the pic doesn't reflect the full beauty and purple richness of this bird.
I have never seen such bird before.
mother and father (unfortunately no other pic; they were very sprightly); mother was visually lighter compared to the father.
Both parents don't carry the common violet factor. So what am i???
I don't know.
thx. No the male isn't a opaline and isn't out of opaline lines. Both parents are split for CHF. The breeder told me he got the same Color in CHF. So i will request a pic.Recio wrote: Hi great Madas,
Great pics. Thaaaaaanks a loooot!!!
Is the bird a female? Is the father opaline? Look at the father's ring: despite the great amount of psittacin we can see in the wings and saddle area, the ring does not show any red pigment (or really an extremely low amount) and the black part of the ring is wider than usually, just like we can see in opaline males. If the father is opaline and opaline has something to do with the apparent colour of the bird, then this bird must be a female. Is it? I know that the bird does not show the typical opaline wing markings ... but which other mutation does induce an increase in psittacin expression and a wider black ring? Could opaline markings be altered by the presence of other mutations?
Something else: the nails of this bird are not specially dark, but they look ligther than in a wild bird ... this means that, a priori, this is not any (new) melanistic mutation.
Maybe we should try to add Opaline to the different mix of Blue, Deep, Dark and Violet, in order to get darker/purple birds.
Regards
Recio
Wow, great body head contrast for a Youngster. Any pic of the Opaline father?Ring0Neck wrote: emerald turquoise opaline/ct
http://parakeet.me/irn/f/PA255818.JPG
This matches my Violet EmeraldBlueViolet Emerald under-wing pic